Task:Brainstorm Java - Revision history

213.243.172.74: /* Community or Nokia builds Iced Tea */

213.243.172.74 — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:19:42 GMT

Community or Nokia builds Iced Tea

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 8 June 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:

	=== Community or Nokia builds [http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page Iced Tea] ===		=== Community or Nokia builds [http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page Iced Tea] ===
-	* ) This actually includes the Cambridge optimisations, so IcedTea supersedes ~~that option~~.	+	* ) This actually includes the Cambridge optimisations, so IcedTea supersedes "Community ports OpenJDK 6 JRE".
		+	*+) Debian already has armel packages of this. Only repackage needed.
		+	*+) The above repackage has been done and uploaded to extras-devel: http://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=51871
		+	*-) However, no hildonization. The Jalimo project has built good Hildonized SWT, which can be combined with this for good results.
	*+) True GPL, no binary components		*+) True GPL, no binary components
	*-) No team so far		*-) No team so far

213.243.172.74 — Tue, 08 Jun 2010 18:15:44 GMT

Community or Nokia builds Iced Tea

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:15, 8 June 2010
Line 51:		Line 51:

	=== Community or Nokia builds [http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page Iced Tea] ===		=== Community or Nokia builds [http://icedtea.classpath.org/wiki/Main_Page Iced Tea] ===
-		+	* ) This actually includes the Cambridge optimisations, so IcedTea supersedes that option.
	*+) True GPL, no binary components		*+) True GPL, no binary components
	*-) No team so far		*-) No team so far

83.81.144.51 — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:11:30 GMT

Community ports OpenJDK 6 JRE (more info)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 5 March 2010
Line 40:		Line 40:
	*+) GPL		*+) GPL
	*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[OpenJDK 6.0_0 (Cambridge Software Labs) on N900]]		*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[OpenJDK 6.0_0 (Cambridge Software Labs) on N900]]
-	*-) Current ports are relatively slow, no JIT or runtime optimizers (like HotSpot)?
	*-) No team as of yet		*-) No team as of yet
	*-) Not "official", so no advertising		*-) Not "official", so no advertising

83.81.144.51 — Fri, 05 Mar 2010 15:09:02 GMT

drawback: no JIT

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:09, 5 March 2010
Line 40:		Line 40:
	*+) GPL		*+) GPL
	*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[OpenJDK 6.0_0 (Cambridge Software Labs) on N900]]		*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[OpenJDK 6.0_0 (Cambridge Software Labs) on N900]]
		+	*-) Current ports are relatively slow, no JIT or runtime optimizers (like HotSpot)?
	*-) No team as of yet		*-) No team as of yet
	*-) Not "official", so no advertising		*-) Not "official", so no advertising

mcbrown — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 20:13:13 GMT

Community ports OpenJDK 6 JRE (more info)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:13, 4 February 2010
Line 39:		Line 39:

	*+) GPL		*+) GPL
-	*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[~~CamSWL~~ OpenJDK on N900]]	+	*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[OpenJDK 6.0_0 (Cambridge Software Labs) on N900]]
	*-) No team as of yet		*-) No team as of yet
	*-) Not "official", so no advertising		*-) Not "official", so no advertising

mcbrown — Thu, 04 Feb 2010 19:40:22 GMT

Community ports OpenJDK 6 JRE (more info)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:40, 4 February 2010
Line 39:		Line 39:

	*+) GPL		*+) GPL
		+	*+) OpenJDK Port of [http://www.camswl.com/openjdk Cambridge Software Labs] seems to work quite good on N900: [[CamSWL OpenJDK on N900]]
	*-) No team as of yet		*-) No team as of yet
	*-) Not "official", so no advertising		*-) Not "official", so no advertising
	*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is		*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is
-		+
	=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===		=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===

130.37.30.185 — Mon, 09 Nov 2009 10:23:53 GMT

Proposal 1: Java ME

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:23, 9 November 2009
Line 22:		Line 22:
	*-) Might be a bit slower		*-) Might be a bit slower

		+	=== Use the Google Android's Virtual Machine Dalvik ===

		+	*+) Open source, fast, mobile phone optimized
		+	*+) It would be great if the Maemo community could profit from all android apps.
		+	*-) Google

	== Proposal 2: [http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded Java SE] ==		== Proposal 2: [http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded Java SE] ==

subcore — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:09:36 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 19 October 2009
Line 21:		Line 21:
	*+-) See above		*+-) See above
	*-) Might be a bit slower		*-) Might be a bit slower
		+
		+

	== Proposal 2: [http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded Java SE] ==		== Proposal 2: [http://java.sun.com/javase/embedded Java SE] ==

subcore — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:09:20 GMT

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:09, 19 October 2009
Line 16:		Line 16:
	*-) Not "official", so no advertising of MIDP capability		*-) Not "official", so no advertising of MIDP capability
	*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is		*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is
-
-

	=== Nokia or the community ports a Java SE implementation, and we use something like [http://www.microemu.org MicroEmu] for ME compatibility ===		=== Nokia or the community ports a Java SE implementation, and we use something like [http://www.microemu.org MicroEmu] for ME compatibility ===
Line 39:		Line 37:
	*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is		*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is

-
-
	=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===		=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===

subcore — Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:08:41 GMT

Nokia ports OpenJDK 6 JRE

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:08, 19 October 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:
	*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is		*-) No info as to how complete this implementation is

-	~~=== Nokia ports OpenJDK 6 JRE ===~~

-	*+-) see above

	=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===		=== Community ports [https://wiki.evolvis.org/jalimo/ Jalimo] ===