Talk:N900 FAQ - Revision history

amigadave: move to Talk:User FAQ#Moved from Talk:N900 FAQ

amigadave — Mon, 06 Dec 2010 14:45:10 GMT

move to Talk:User FAQ#Moved from Talk:N900 FAQ

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:45, 6 December 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page.~~	+	#REDIRECT [[Talk:User FAQ#Moved from Talk:N900 FAQ]]
-	--[[User~~:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 18:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)~~	+
-		+
-		+
-	~~I have no huge problem with that idea. I have 3 concerns though:~~	+
-		+
-	* The FAQ ~~was conceptualized as separate because the device is uniquely what is bringing many people to the site with specific N900-related questions (some of which are maemo-related, I grant)~~	+
-	* The regular FAQ could be intimidating to new users who are uninterested in the minutiae of development, for instance - with the best will in the world, at present, 'how do I get root access' is not something your new N900 owner or prospective owner would give a monkey's about, if I may be frank.	+
-	* Putting this into the regular FAQ might be a bit of overkill (there's a lot here that is really rather specific)	+
-		+
-	To address these, it's necessary to revamp the FAQ page as is radically. e.g. with questions at top, compartmentalized, and linked to a set of answers either below or perhaps on different page(s) - there is a reason for this, btw - pages that are too long are not friendly, load slowly, and are frustrating on small screens.	+
-		+
-	~~I digress. Let's talk~~	+
-		+
-	~~Steve Marsh. 13:57 EST 4/11/09~~	+
-		+
-	~~== Developer & user FAQs ==~~	+
-		+
-	Steve: I have proposed 2 FAQs in the [[wiki gardeners]] page - one for a developer FAQ and one for a user FAQ - we already have about 7 different pages which are candidates for merges into one or the other:	+
-		+
-	~~For developers:~~	+
-	* [[Developer_FAQ#~~Maemo_SDK_and_Scratchbox\|Q&A - SDK and Scratchbox]]~~	+
-	* [[Q&A Porting to Fremantle]]	+
-	* [[Autobuilder FAQ]]	+
-		+
-	~~For users & power users~~:	+
-	* [[Questions and answers]]	+
-	* [[Frequently asked questions]]	+
-	* [[Troubleshooting]]	+
-	* [[N900 FAQ]]	+
-		+
-	I think it would be good to simplify both the maintenance and the navigation for users by avoiding duplication of information and possible conflicting information and have all of these be in the one place, with clear & good headings & navigation.	+
-		+
-	~~--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 19:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)~~	+
-		+
-	~~== FAQ structure ==~~	+
-		+
-	~~Dave~~	+
-		+
-	I think that structure is an excellent one, and I'd be delighted to see some of (all of?) the N900FAQ embedded within where it makes sense. I'd also be delighted to help out in the editing if you think that it's possible/sensible.	+
-		+
-	~~To clarify - the structure I refer it is Developer_FAQ and USER-FAQ... I thin the N900 thing has bits of both in it, but it's mostly user.~~	+
-		+
-	As an aside, in my head I can also see a graduated structure to the FAQ, with simple Q's leading to more complex ones in some clever way I haven't managed to make clear to myself yet! (but perhaps simply by their order in the list)	+
-		+
-	~~Steve~~	+
-		+
-	~~== Idea on FAQ ==~~	+
-		+
-	~~Dave (and anyone listening)~~	+
-		+
-	~~Putting together idea for the user faq. Take a look at http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Smarsh/Ideas/FAQIdea and let me know if it's worth continuing with...?~~	+
-		+
-	~~[[User:smarsh\|smarsh]] 20:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)~~	+

dneary: /* Developer & user FAQs */

dneary — Wed, 12 May 2010 20:42:22 GMT

Developer & user FAQs

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:42, 12 May 2010
Line 17:		Line 17:
	== Developer & user FAQs ==		== Developer & user FAQs ==

-	Steve: I have proposed 2 FAQs in the [[~~Maemowiki Action Group~~]] page - one for a developer FAQ and one for a user FAQ - we already have about 7 different pages which are candidates for merges into one or the other:	+	Steve: I have proposed 2 FAQs in the [[wiki gardeners]] page - one for a developer FAQ and one for a user FAQ - we already have about 7 different pages which are candidates for merges into one or the other:

	For developers:		For developers:

amigadave: /* Developer & user FAQs */ fix link

amigadave — Mon, 12 Apr 2010 08:20:28 GMT

Developer & user FAQs: fix link

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:20, 12 April 2010
Line 20:		Line 20:

	For developers:		For developers:
-	* [[Q&A - SDK and Scratchbox]]	+	* [[Developer_FAQ#Maemo_SDK_and_Scratchbox\|Q&A - SDK and Scratchbox]]
	* [[Q&A Porting to Fremantle]]		* [[Q&A Porting to Fremantle]]
	* [[Autobuilder FAQ]]		* [[Autobuilder FAQ]]

smarsh: /* Idea on FAQ */

smarsh — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:35:34 GMT

Idea on FAQ

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 6 November 2009
Line 51:		Line 51:

	Putting together idea for the user faq. Take a look at http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Smarsh/Ideas/FAQIdea and let me know if it's worth continuing with...?		Putting together idea for the user faq. Take a look at http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Smarsh/Ideas/FAQIdea and let me know if it's worth continuing with...?
		+
		+	[[User:smarsh\|smarsh]] 20:35, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

smarsh: /* Idea on FAQ */ new section

smarsh — Fri, 06 Nov 2009 20:35:20 GMT

Idea on FAQ: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:35, 6 November 2009
Line 45:		Line 45:

	Steve		Steve
		+
		+	== Idea on FAQ ==
		+
		+	Dave (and anyone listening)
		+
		+	Putting together idea for the user faq. Take a look at http://wiki.maemo.org/User:Smarsh/Ideas/FAQIdea and let me know if it's worth continuing with...?

smarsh: /* FAQ structure */

smarsh — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:29:50 GMT

FAQ structure

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:29, 4 November 2009
Line 39:		Line 39:

	I think that structure is an excellent one, and I'd be delighted to see some of (all of?) the N900FAQ embedded within where it makes sense. I'd also be delighted to help out in the editing if you think that it's possible/sensible.		I think that structure is an excellent one, and I'd be delighted to see some of (all of?) the N900FAQ embedded within where it makes sense. I'd also be delighted to help out in the editing if you think that it's possible/sensible.
		+
		+	To clarify - the structure I refer it is Developer_FAQ and USER-FAQ... I thin the N900 thing has bits of both in it, but it's mostly user.
		+
		+	As an aside, in my head I can also see a graduated structure to the FAQ, with simple Q's leading to more complex ones in some clever way I haven't managed to make clear to myself yet! (but perhaps simply by their order in the list)

	Steve		Steve

smarsh: /* FAQ structure */ new section

smarsh — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:27:41 GMT

FAQ structure: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:27, 4 November 2009
Line 33:		Line 33:

	--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 19:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 19:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+	== FAQ structure ==
		+
		+	Dave
		+
		+	I think that structure is an excellent one, and I'd be delighted to see some of (all of?) the N900FAQ embedded within where it makes sense. I'd also be delighted to help out in the editing if you think that it's possible/sensible.
		+
		+	Steve

dneary: /* Developer & user FAQs */ new section

dneary — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 19:25:11 GMT

Developer & user FAQs: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:25, 4 November 2009
Line 14:		Line 14:

	Steve Marsh. 13:57 EST 4/11/09		Steve Marsh. 13:57 EST 4/11/09
		+
		+	== Developer & user FAQs ==
		+
		+	Steve: I have proposed 2 FAQs in the [[Maemowiki Action Group]] page - one for a developer FAQ and one for a user FAQ - we already have about 7 different pages which are candidates for merges into one or the other:
		+
		+	For developers:
		+	* [[Q&A - SDK and Scratchbox]]
		+	* [[Q&A Porting to Fremantle]]
		+	* [[Autobuilder FAQ]]
		+
		+	For users & power users:
		+	* [[Questions and answers]]
		+	* [[Frequently asked questions]]
		+	* [[Troubleshooting]]
		+	* [[N900 FAQ]]
		+
		+	I think it would be good to simplify both the maintenance and the navigation for users by avoiding duplication of information and possible conflicting information and have all of these be in the one place, with clear & good headings & navigation.
		+
		+	--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 19:25, 4 November 2009 (UTC)

smarsh: replying...

smarsh — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:59:56 GMT

replying...

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:59, 4 November 2009
Line 1:		Line 1:
	I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page.		I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page.
	--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 18:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)		--[[User:dneary\|Dave Neary]] 18:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)
		+
		+
		+	I have no huge problem with that idea. I have 3 concerns though:
		+
		+	* The FAQ was conceptualized as separate because the device is uniquely what is bringing many people to the site with specific N900-related questions (some of which are maemo-related, I grant)
		+	* The regular FAQ could be intimidating to new users who are uninterested in the minutiae of development, for instance - with the best will in the world, at present, 'how do I get root access' is not something your new N900 owner or prospective owner would give a monkey's about, if I may be frank.
		+	* Putting this into the regular FAQ might be a bit of overkill (there's a lot here that is really rather specific)
		+
		+	To address these, it's necessary to revamp the FAQ page as is radically. e.g. with questions at top, compartmentalized, and linked to a set of answers either below or perhaps on different page(s) - there is a reason for this, btw - pages that are too long are not friendly, load slowly, and are frustrating on small screens.
		+
		+	I digress. Let's talk
		+
		+	Steve Marsh. 13:57 EST 4/11/09

dneary: New page: I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page. --~~~~

dneary — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 18:32:22 GMT

New page: I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page. --~~~~

New page

I propose including this in just a FAQ, rather than having a separate N900 page.
--[[User:dneary|Dave Neary]] 18:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)