Community SSU/Development/Calendar - Revision history

amigadave: cut toplevel heading

amigadave — Mon, 30 May 2011 14:48:36 GMT

cut toplevel heading

← Older revision		Revision as of 14:48, 30 May 2011
Line 1:		Line 1:
-	~~=Calendar Replacement Application=~~
-
	I'm just starting the ball rolling here with a list of the things we'll need to do/think about in replacing the in-built Calendar app.		I'm just starting the ball rolling here with a list of the things we'll need to do/think about in replacing the in-built Calendar app.

lardman: /* Calendar Replacement Application */

lardman — Wed, 25 May 2011 12:38:22 GMT

Calendar Replacement Application

← Older revision		Revision as of 12:38, 25 May 2011
Line 11:		Line 11:
	To be future proof, I think that it should also be written in Qt.		To be future proof, I think that it should also be written in Qt.

		+	==Existing Bugs in closed source Calendar app that should be fixed==
		+
		+	Add link to appropriate bugzilla page
		+
		+	Also list bugs with explanation here.

	==Required Features ==		==Required Features ==

lardman: Getting the ball rolling

lardman — Wed, 25 May 2011 11:55:23 GMT

Getting the ball rolling

New page

=Calendar Replacement Application=

I'm just starting the ball rolling here with a list of the things we'll need to do/think about in replacing the in-built Calendar app.

The reason we need to replace it, other than the fact that it is rather deficient in many ways, is that the UI is closed. The backend is open though, so that gives us the opportunity to avoid breaking other applications which use the same data, etc.

==Coding and Architecture==

To be worth doing, this application should have clear abstraction between the UI and the backend. This means it would then be possible to use the same UI on e.g. Meego with a different backend, as well as on Maemo CSSU.

To be future proof, I think that it should also be written in Qt.

==Required Features ==

These are features which are already present and which would be expected for this application to be able to replace the closed source version

==Would be nice to have features==

These are more pie in the sky features, which don't need to be present immediately