http://bugs.maemo.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Template_talk%3ARelease_history_table 2026-04-22T01:03:23Z Revision history for this page on the wiki MediaWiki 1.15.5-7 http://bugs.maemo.com/index.php?title=Template_talk:Release_history_table&diff=1511&oldid=prev 2008-06-13T00:56:33Z

<p><span class="autocomment">Version number Diablo onwards</span></p> <table style="background-color: white; color:black;"> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <col class='diff-marker' /> <col class='diff-content' /> <tr valign='top'> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">← Older revision</td> <td colspan='2' style="background-color: white; color:black;">Revision as of 00:56, 13 June 2008</td> </tr> <tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td> <td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Line 2:</td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"></td></tr> <tr><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Oh, thanks for this very needed timetable. As far as I'm aware though, there are no version numbers announced for Diablo, Fremantle and Harmattan. Same for this OS2009. I'd take them out before people start especulating, thinking that this page in maemo.org is some kind of official word. Since the table is so complete and looks so good (congratulations!) I wouldn't be surprised. Also, what about having maemo as a first column? Being this site maemo.org it would make sense to show a maemo centric table. Also you could start properly with 1.0.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 19:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</div></td><td class='diff-marker'> </td><td style="background: #eee; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div>Oh, thanks for this very needed timetable. As far as I'm aware though, there are no version numbers announced for Diablo, Fremantle and Harmattan. Same for this OS2009. I'd take them out before people start especulating, thinking that this page in maemo.org is some kind of official word. Since the table is so complete and looks so good (congratulations!) I wouldn't be surprised. Also, what about having maemo as a first column? Being this site maemo.org it would make sense to show a maemo centric table. Also you could start properly with 1.0.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 19:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</div></td></tr> <tr><td colspan="2">&nbsp;</td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="background: #cfc; color:black; font-size: smaller;"><div><ins style="color: red; font-weight: bold; text-decoration: none;">:Will remove the version speculation. Well, except for Diablo. I mean, c'mon now it ''is'' OS2008 and it ''is'' 4.1. ;) As for the OS2005/1.x releases, this is the way it is due to a lack of information about a lot of the early maemo releases. If you (or somebody else) could get me some version numbers and dates for it I'd be more than happy to flesh it out. —[[User:generalantilles|GeneralAntilles]] 00:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)</ins></div></td></tr> <!-- diff generator: internal 2026-04-22 01:03:23 --> </table>

generalantilles http://bugs.maemo.com/index.php?title=Template_talk:Release_history_table&diff=1496&oldid=prev 2008-06-12T19:08:19Z

<p>Version number Diablo onwards</p> <p><b>New page</b></p><div>== Version number Diablo onwards ==<br /> <br /> Oh, thanks for this very needed timetable. As far as I'm aware though, there are no version numbers announced for Diablo, Fremantle and Harmattan. Same for this OS2009. I'd take them out before people start especulating, thinking that this page in maemo.org is some kind of official word. Since the table is so complete and looks so good (congratulations!) I wouldn't be surprised. Also, what about having maemo as a first column? Being this site maemo.org it would make sense to show a maemo centric table. Also you could start properly with 1.0.--[[User:qgil|qgil]] 19:08, 12 June 2008 (UTC)</div>

qgil