Talk:Task:Maemo Community distribution - Revision history

qgil: /* "osso" = DEPRECATED */ new section

2008-10-30T08:26:25Z

"osso" = DEPRECATED: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:26, 30 October 2008
Line 7:		Line 7:

	mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. --[[User:marcell\|marcell]]		mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. --[[User:marcell\|marcell]]
		+
		+	== "osso" = DEPRECATED ==
		+
		+	Please leave "osso" rest in peace and don't use it in anything new. Yes, it is still in the name of packages and stuff but from our perspective this is all legacy in the way of deprecation. Thanks! --[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 08:26, 30 October 2008 (UTC)

generalantilles: /* Busybox */

2008-10-03T07:01:20Z

Busybox

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:01, 3 October 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson\|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)		Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson\|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
		+	: Yeah, I was thinking about this yesterday. The problem isn't really the packaging, but setting up the initscripts so they don't choke on the gnutils. Obviously somebody will have to work this all out, but it's a perfectly reasonable goal for the community distribution to allow swapping in coreutils components easily. —[[User:generalantilles\|GeneralAntilles]] 07:01, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

	== Nokia binaries ==		== Nokia binaries ==

	mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. --[[User:marcell\|marcell]]		mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. --[[User:marcell\|marcell]]

marcell at 06:25, 3 October 2008

2008-10-03T06:25:02Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 3 October 2008
Line 5:		Line 5:
	== Nokia binaries ==		== Nokia binaries ==

-	mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though.	+	mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though. --[[User:marcell\|marcell]]

marcell at 06:24, 3 October 2008

2008-10-03T06:24:27Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:24, 3 October 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:

	Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson\|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)		Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson\|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== Nokia binaries ==
		+
		+	mvo suggested a slightly different solution: we set up a file in garage.maemo.org where the community maintainers could list the pacakges that they would like to see in non-free and a cron script on stage would copy these packages from eg. updates/diablo-1 to updates/diablo-1/non-free. I am still waiting for approval/rejection for the whole idea though.

benson: Busybox

2008-10-03T03:03:58Z

Busybox

New page

== Busybox ==

Would some repackaging to avoid the conflicts between busybox and coreutils et al. (or replacing busybox for good) as [http://lists.maemo.org/pipermail/maemo-developers/2008-August/034643.html discussed] in maemo-developers be plausible in the community distribution? --[[User:benson|benson]] 03:03, 3 October 2008 (UTC)