Talk:Maemo Summit 2008/Accommodation - Revision history

sixwheeledbeast: Reverted edits by 5.188.210.8 (Talk) to last revision by timsamoff

2021-07-20T21:54:04Z

Reverted edits by 5.188.210.8 (Talk) to last revision by timsamoff

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:54, 20 July 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== xbzqbayx ==~~
-
-	~~<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>~~
-
-	~~== xbzqbayx ==~~
-
-	~~<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>~~

5.188.210.8: /* xbzqbayx */ new section

2021-07-20T21:42:16Z

xbzqbayx: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:42, 20 July 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== xbzqbayx ==
		+
		+	<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>

	== xbzqbayx ==		== xbzqbayx ==

	<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>		<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>

5.188.210.8: /* xbzqbayx */ new section

2021-07-20T21:41:59Z

xbzqbayx: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:41, 20 July 2021
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== xbzqbayx ==
		+
		+	<a href="https://sirilending.com/">bad credit loans guaranteed approval</a>

timsamoff: Removing spam

2017-05-21T13:59:02Z

Removing spam

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:59, 21 May 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
-
-	~~== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==~~
-
-	~~southern financial payday loan~~
-
-	~~<a href=http://arealpaydayloan.com/> payday loans online</a>~~
-
-	~~<a href="http://arealpaydayloan.com/"> loans for bad credit</a>~~
-
-	~~personal loans in tampa fl~~
-
-	~~== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==~~
-
-	~~southern financial payday loan~~
-
-	~~<a href=http://arealpaydayloan.com/> payday loans online</a>~~
-
-	~~<a href="http://arealpaydayloan.com/"> loans for bad credit</a>~~
-
-	~~personal loans in tampa fl~~

186.122.19.75: /* best cash advance Tucson AZ */ new section

2017-05-21T04:18:01Z

best cash advance Tucson AZ: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:18, 21 May 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==
		+
		+	southern financial payday loan
		+
		+	<a href=http://arealpaydayloan.com/> payday loans online</a>
		+
		+	<a href="http://arealpaydayloan.com/"> loans for bad credit</a>
		+
		+	personal loans in tampa fl

	== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==		== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==

186.122.19.75: /* best cash advance Tucson AZ */ new section

2017-05-21T04:17:25Z

best cash advance Tucson AZ: new section

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:17, 21 May 2017
Line 17:		Line 17:
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== best cash advance Tucson AZ ==
		+
		+	southern financial payday loan
		+
		+	<a href=http://arealpaydayloan.com/> payday loans online</a>
		+
		+	<a href="http://arealpaydayloan.com/"> loans for bad credit</a>
		+
		+	personal loans in tampa fl

jaffa: /* Ending up in the same hotel */

2008-07-17T19:28:56Z

Ending up in the same hotel

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 17 July 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

qgil: /* Ending up in the same hotel */

2008-07-17T18:19:05Z

Ending up in the same hotel

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 17 July 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

jaffa: /* Ending up in the same hotel */ Accomodation limit

2008-07-17T15:11:58Z

Ending up in the same hotel: Accomodation limit

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 17 July 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]		:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]
	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

qgil: /* Ending up in the same hotel */

2008-07-15T18:00:20Z

Ending up in the same hotel

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 15 July 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::Looks like it's full now, damn.--[[User:anidel\|anidel]] 07:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Looks like it's full now, damn.--[[User:anidel\|anidel]] 07:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]		:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]
		+	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 19:28, 17 July 2008
Line 16:		Line 16:
	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::::Fair enough. Expense systems are never the most fun thing at the best of time, and it's you who'll have the hassle! --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 19:28, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:19, 17 July 2008
Line 15:		Line 15:
	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)		:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	::::::We need to find a simple and sane way to deal with it. The easiest for the accountants is to pay just what says in the invoice. Anything departing from there is just complex. I' ok fixing the '''reference''' limit at 400€. If someone goes beyond that point no problem. If someone goes far beyond but taking out breakfast things look better no problem. If we talk about limits, splitting, refactoring, recalculating... then we have a lot of hassle paying back expenses to every extra participant.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:19, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:11, 17 July 2008
Line 14:		Line 14:
	:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]		:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]
	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
		+	:::::Let's say €400 for accomodation expenses limit and anything over that is split between participant and Nokia? Clarify that all meals are excluded unless included in the hotel rates, too? --[[User:jaffa\|Jaffa]] 15:11, 17 July 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:00, 15 July 2008
Line 13:		Line 13:
	::::Looks like it's full now, damn.--[[User:anidel\|anidel]] 07:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)		::::Looks like it's full now, damn.--[[User:anidel\|anidel]] 07:13, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
	:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]		:::Hotel Ibis Berlin Mitte wants exactly 375EUR for 5 nights, but that doesn't cover breakfast (extra 9.50EUR per night). Mercure wants more than 400 EUR. There's another Ibis that's a bit closer, but that one is sold out already. --[[User:mgedmin\|mgedmin]]
		+	::::Then let's raise the limit to 425€ or 450€? Guys, agree on something and let me know.--[[User:qgil\|qgil]] 18:00, 15 July 2008 (UTC)